CFOs: Your code of practice needs you

Local government accounting is facing its annual review, with changes due to be implemented in 2013/14. To ensure the plans are practical, chief finance officers and other senior staff need to respond to the consultation on the proposed code Read more

Tags: | | | | | | Comment

London 2012: private schools & public sports

There have been suggestions that too many of Britain’s top Olympians have been educated privately, but the arguments from Left and Right miss one simple truth Read more

Tags: | | | | | 2 comments

Behind the ‘abolish GCSEs’ headlines

Michael Gove is at risk of making changes to the school curriculum and exam system that have not been thought through. They could have a damaging effect on standards Read more

Tags: | | | | Comment

Baffled over Scots’ ballot

When Scotland goes to the polls next week, voters may be confused about whether they are deciding on local or national issues.  In some cases the electorate is being asked to vote on manifesto promises that can’t in fact be delivered locally Read more

Tags: | | | | | | 1 comment

Tweet defeat for academies

Tweeting questions to the secretary of state for education is an interesting experience but not the best way to get to grips with the accountability of academy schools Read more

Tags: | | | | | | Comment

Data overload

Is the coalition government making the same mistake as its Labour predecessor in bombarding the public with too much information? The latest incarnation of school league tables suggests it might be Read more

Tags: | | | | 1 comment

Turning the tables

School league tables in England have been amended again by the Department for Education. The changes are welcome and will help parents, but the DfE could still do better Read more

Tags: | | | 3 comments

Classrooms, capability and culture

Michael Gove’s plans to make it easier to sack underperforming teachers are sensible, but they will be meaningless unless there is a major cultural shift in schools Read more

Tags: | | | 1 comment

Arguing the case for academies

Michael Gove should cease preaching to the converted on academies and try to win over sceptical parents, governors and teachers Read more

Tags: | | | | | 3 comments

Give and take on schools funding

The Chancellor’s announcement on capital funding for schools is only giving back a bit of the sums taken away when Building Schools for the Future was cancelled. And it is not being shared out fairly

Surely the most brazen aspect of the rather disjointed display by the Chancellor in his Autumn Statement was the announcement on school capital funding.  To recap, shortly after coming to office, Michael Gove earned his spurs with the Treasury by abruptly cancelling over 700 school building projects, loudly proclaiming his ability to achieve ‘better value for money’, and denouncing Labour’s Building Schools for the Future programme as a ‘costly failure’. He later lost a court case over a failure to consult properly.

Since then, some capital allocations were made to ensure the sponsored academies programme (the difficult bit that involves rather more than a £15-25k legal bill) was able to continue and to provide some funds to the free schools programme. There has also been some cash to help local authorities to deal with an unexpected surge in demand for school places, in part caused by a decline in private school take-up among the middle classes. George Osborne has now given back another £1.2 bn to be split evenly between free schools and school places.

But, the government hasn’t just cancelled most new building in schools, at significant cost not just to the fabric of schools, but also to the construction sector. It has also decimated schools’ ability to keep their buildings in good repair, by virtually eliminating their annual school capital grant that David Blunkett introduced, known as formula capital. There is, of course, a strong economic argument for pegging teachers’ pay and reining in current spending in schools, as much as everywhere else: and with the IFS forecasting that 55% of primaries and 70% of secondaries will be losers, despite the pupil premium, that is happening.

However, there is far less justification, as Osborne now seems to allow, for the huge curb on schools capital investment. Moreover, the focus on free schools capital is particularly odd, since a much-touted attraction of free schools was, apparently, their ability to provide a presumably superior education at the same cost as the school down the road. Now, it seems that they will cost an average – and many of these will be primaries – of £6m each.

I’ve no problem with free schools having such capital funding, where they are meeting demonstrable need, or are genuinely helping tackle poverty. And I welcome the new specialist maths colleges (even if this is from a government that axed support for specialist school networks). But, let’s be clear: a lot of this money is at the expense of rebuilding other schools in deprived areas. And the list of free schools to date suggests that the genuine parent-promoted or teacher-led schools are being supplemented to boost the numbers by a combination of minor independent and faith schools joining the state system, Middle School/two-tier refuseniks and local authority schools under another guise. The idea that those latter groups deserve preferential capital treatment over other schools and academies is less than convincing.

It is eight months since the DFE published the not hugely inspiring James review of schools capital. When I tried to open it from the DFE website, I was informed that the ‘file is damaged and could not be repaired’. Fittingly, since there is still no coherent programme for infrastructural investment (and that includes technology) yet. Instead of another Gordon Brown-style rabbit-out-of-hat exercise, the Chancellor should have given schools a clear idea of the coalition’s investment plans for the duration of the parliament. Had he done so, he might have raised at least half a cheer from those upon whom he has just imposed 15-20% real terms pay cuts (including extra pension contributions) – and from the construction sector as well.

This post first appeared on Conor’s Commentary

Tags: | | | Comment