<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Share and share alike, by Steve Freer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opinion.publicfinance.co.uk/2010/01/share-and-share-alike-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opinion.publicfinance.co.uk/2010/01/share-and-share-alike-2/</link>
	<description>Instant analysis from expert bloggers and highlights from Public Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keene</title>
		<link>http://opinion.publicfinance.co.uk/2010/01/share-and-share-alike-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opinion.publicfinance.co.uk/?p=2902#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>The case for county sized Unitary Government in a nutshell! It is just a pity that it has taken the imminence of funding cuts to bring us to where we now are, i.e. just beginning to  put the taxpayers&#039; interest a little higher up the agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case for county sized Unitary Government in a nutshell! It is just a pity that it has taken the imminence of funding cuts to bring us to where we now are, i.e. just beginning to  put the taxpayers&#8217; interest a little higher up the agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

